Global Public Policy Institute
Reinhardtstraße 15
10117 Berlin
Germany
Phone +49 30 275 959 75-0
Fax +49 30 690 88 200
E-Mail gppi@gppi.net
Related focus areas
Rising Powers and Global Governance: The Joint Stakeholders Program
Related projects
Sino-African Energy Relations: China as a Catalyst for Renewable Energy Development in Africa?
Global Governance 2020: Designing Scenarios for the Future of International Institutions
EU Foreign Policy Towards China: The Institutional Politics of Cooperation
Global Climate Governance and the Making of China's Climate Change Policy
Human Rights and Global Governance: Will China’s Rise Lead to a New Normative Order?
Recent publications
Miriam Schröder (2011)
The Road Towards China’s Integration Into an International Emissions Trading
GPPi policy paper no. 13Björn Conrad and Mirjam Meissner (2011)
Catching a Second Wind – Changing the Logic of International Cooperation in China’s Wind Energy Sector
GPPi policy paper no. 12Björn Conrad (2010)
Bureaucratic Land Rush. China’s Administrative Battles in the Arena of Climate Change Policy
Harvard Asia Quarterly, Spring 2010, pp 52-64
Björn Conrad (2009)
The world's rising green power? Europe must help Beijing's low-carbon revolution succeed
European Voice, 26 November 2009
Björn Conrad (2009)
Klimaschutz: Chinas heimliche Revolution
Handelsblatt, 18 November 2009
(Full page view)
Joint Stakeholders in Global Energy Governance? Prospects for joint global problem-solving between the EU and China
November 2009 – April 2011
Project context
The common dependency on energy, shared by societies around the world, entails policy challenges of global nature and scope. From dealing with the negative externalities of carbon dioxide emissions and devising rules for the market for oil to regulating access to the civilian use of nuclear technology, energy poses challenges that transcend national borders, involve both the public and private sectors and cannot be meaningfully addressed at a national or regional (eg European) level. In short: Energy interdependence calls for global energy governance. The European Union has been a champion of effective multilateralism in all key areas of global energy governance. However, current reality falls well short of these goals.
One of the most important shortcomings of the status quo is that existing mechanisms have failed to effectively include crucial new players in the global energy arena. This especially holds true with regards to China, an increasingly important player and unavoidable factor in view of managing global energy challenges. Indeed, as Javier Solana, the first EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, has argued the EU needs to “go beyond a narrow Western prism” in seeking effective global energy governance. “This means thinking about changing the governance system of energy, involving new players.” However, both policymakers and researchers in Europe have not sufficiently heeded Solana’s call to move beyond a narrow Western prism. So far there is insufficient cooperation between Europe and China in the area of energy governance and as a consequence researchers as well as policymakers in Europe still know little about the internal context, motivations and objectives of China's approaches to global energy governance.
Project objectives
In order to fill this gap, policy research needs to proceed in three steps: First, analyze the drivers that shape European and Chinese approaches to global energy governance. Second, assess areas of convergence and divergence and third, based on these analyses, sketch out concrete options and pathways for joint stakeholdership of global energy governance – both from a positive and a normative perspective. In order to do so, the project zooms in on a number of specific policy issues, from the governance of global carbon emissions to the governance of global oil markets.
The pilot project provided a first cut at each of these three steps. We did so with partners from Europe (Oxford University, Elcano Royal Institute), China (Peking University) and the US (Brookings Institution as an associated partner). We held two internal workshops (in March 2010 and July 2010) and prepared a number of background papers.
