Global Public Policy Institute
Reinhardtstraße 15
10117 Berlin
Germany
Phone +49 30 275 959 75-0
Fax +49 30 690 88 200
E-Mail gppi@gppi.net
Related focus area
Related projects
Zukunftsbrücke: Chinese-German Young Professional Campus
Human Rights and Global Governance: Will China’s Rise Lead to a New Normative Order?
Global Climate Change Governance and the Making of China's Climate Change Policy
Related publications
Oliver Stuenkel (2012)
BRICS and the ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ Concept
The Hindu, 12 March 2012
Thorsten Benner (2011)
Ban Ki-moon's Second Term: The Bridge to Where?
Deutsche Welle, 30 December 2011
Björn Conrad (2011)
China in Copenhagen: Reconciling the “Beijing Climate Revolution” and the “Copenhagen Climate Obstinacy”
The China Quarterly
Oliver Stuenkel (2011)
Identity and the Concept of the West: The Case of Brazil and India
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional: 54 (1)
China in Copenhagen
Reconciling the “Beijing Climate Revolution” and the “Copenhagen Climate Obstinacy”
Article • 2011
The China Quarterly (accepted for publication)
Björn Conrad
The contradiction between the astonishing dynamic of China’s domestic climate policy agenda and its seemingly unwavering and tenacious position in international climate negotiations presents a puzzle that, on closer inspection, reveals much about a nation at the crossroads, undecided which way to turn. The alterations in China’s political interests connected to the issue of climate change are undeniable and clearly evident in the domestic policy changes China introduced during previous years. However, China’s leadership thus far has remained hesitant to fully translate this new set of interests into a coherent position in the international arena. China's mounting difficulties to reconcile its rapidly changing role on the international stage with its altered domestic situation as well as its traditional foreign policy interests and principles undermines China's ability to pursue a consistent and effective strategy in international climate negotiations. China's hesitance to decisively redefine its role in the international arena leads to a number of inconsistencies that particularly plagued China's position during the Copenhagen conference and ultimately left China, as everyone else, with empty hands. The Copenhagen negotiations demonstrated that China's leadership will have to resolutely address these inconsistencies if it wants to realize the significant benefits that international climate cooperation offers for China.
